PD1059
ESTIMATION OF RESTING ENERGY EXPENDITURE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL OR PARTIAL PANCREATECTOMY FOR PANCREATIC TUMORS: A COMPARISON OF INDIRECT CALORIMETRY AND PREDICTIVE EQUATIONS
P. Papanastasiou1,2,3, Z. Bouloubasi1, D. Karagiannis1,*, O. Georgolopoulou1, D. Chasiotis4, I. Goulis5, M. Dimitriou2
1Department of Clinical Nutrition, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, 2School of Health Sciences, Department of Nutritional Science and Dietetics, University of Peloponnese, Kalamata, 3Laboratory of Hygiene, Social and Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 42nd Department of Surgery, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, 5Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
Rationale: Total or partial pancreatectomy is associated with significant metabolic stress and high risk of postoperative malnutrition. Accurate estimation of resting energy expenditure (REE) is essential, as predictive equations may not reflect true energy needs.
Methods: A prospective study among patients undergoing total or partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic tumors was conducted. REE was measured by indirect calorimetry (mREE) and compared with the Harris–Benedict and Schofield equations and the weight-based approaches (25 and 30 kcal/kg). Agreement was assessed using linear regression and Bland–Altman analysis, accuracy indices included ±10%, ±20%, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).
Results: In 26 patients (mean age, 66.7±8.7 years; 53.8% male) undergoing pancreatic resection (17 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 8 distal pancreatectomies, 1 total pancreatectomy), 60% were at preoperative malnutrition risk. Median measured REE was 1482 kcal/day, rising to 1706 kcal/day after activity adjustment (×1.15) within 14 postoperative days. At 3-6 months postoperatively, patients demonstrated significant declines in nutritional status with a median body weight reduction of −7.3% and a decrease in BMI of −2 kg/m². The 30 kcal/kg method showed the lowest accuracy (MAPE 23.2%, RMSE 417 kcal/day) and overestimated energy needs. Harris–Benedict underestimated mREE in 61.5% of cases, while the 25 kcal/kg approach showed more balanced performance.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection exhibit elevated postoperative energy demands. Predictive equations lack reliability, favoring indirect calorimetry for precision. Absent this, 25 kcal/kg/day offers a viable alternative. Sustained weight loss underscores the need for prolonged nutritional surveillance.
Disclosure of Interest: None declared
