PW20 - ESTABLISHING FAT-FREE MASS INDEX CUT-OFFS FOR LOW MUSCLE MASS IN OLDER JAPANESE ADULTS: A GLIM-ORIENTED STUDY
PW20
ESTABLISHING FAT-FREE MASS INDEX CUT-OFFS FOR LOW MUSCLE MASS IN OLDER JAPANESE ADULTS: A GLIM-ORIENTED STUDY
K. Maeda1,2,*, S. Takagi3, S. Satake2,3,4,5, S. Miyahara2,5, Y. Ishida6, H. Akatsu5, H. Arai7
1Nutrition Therapy Support Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, 2Department of Geriatric Medicine, 3Department of Nutrition Management, 4Department of Frailty Research, 5Center for Frailty and Locomotive Syndrome, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, 6Department of Nutrition, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, 7National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
Rationale: Determining low muscle mass is central to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, yet population-specific fat-free mass index (FFMI) cut-offs in Asia remain undefined. This study aimed to derive sex-specific FFMI thresholds in older Japanese outpatients and assess their clinical relevance.
Methods: In this prospective study, body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis to calculate FFMI, while dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was employed to assess the appendicular skeletal muscle index (ASMI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the optimal FFMI cut-offs, with reduced ASMI assessed by DXA (<7.0 kg/m² for men and <5.4 kg/m² for women) as the reference standard. Fall incidence was recorded over one year to evaluate the predictive value of the identified thresholds.
Results: A total of 696 participants (mean age 76.1 ± 7.4 years; 64.8% female) were enrolled. The optimal FFMI cut-offs were identified as <17.5 kg/m² for men and <14.4 kg/m² for women. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.926 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.893–0.958) for men and 0.927 (0.902–0.953) for women, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity in detecting low ASMI assessed by DXA. During the one-year follow-up, 25.9% of participants experienced at least one fall, and individuals with FFMI values below these cut-offs had a significantly increased risk of falling (odds ratio 1.49, 95%CI 1.01–2.20, p=0.044).
Conclusion: The newly defined FFMI thresholds offer an accessible alternative to DXA for the clinical application of GLIM in older Japanese adults. Early detection of malnutrition using these cut-offs may improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of functional decline.
Disclosure of Interest: None declared