PD285 - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTIONS AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ICU AND NON-ICU TRAUMA PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE INTERVENTIONAL STUDY

Linked sessions

PD285

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTIONS AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ICU AND NON-ICU TRAUMA PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE INTERVENTIONAL STUDY

K. PAL CHOWDHURY1,*, R. CHOUDHURI2, S. -.- SWAIKA3, J. MUKHOPADHYAY4, A. HAZRA5, A. DEY6, A. K. SYAMAL7

1Emergency Medicine, 2Anesthesiology, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, 3Anesthesiology, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, 4Medicine, 5Pharmacology, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, 6Allied Health Science, Brainware University, Kolkata, 7Allied Health Science, Swami Vivekananda University , Barasat, India

 

Rationale: Inadequate nutrition can generate metabolic stress and poor clinical outcomes. The aim of the study to evaluate a structured Nutrition Care Process (NCP) on trauma patients. The objectives are to record assessment scores to establish a NCP framework and analyse clinical outcomes and formulate evidence-based nutrition protocols.

Methods: The prospective interventional study involves 248 adult patients(≥18y) with head and orthopaedic injuries. Participants were divided into two ICU(n=124) with individualized nutritional plans and a non-ICU(n=124) group with standard hospital diets. Comprehensive nutritional and clinical assessments were performed using validated tools, including: SGA, NRS, APACHE IV, SOFA, NUTRIC, GCS. Interventions were dynamically tailored based on baseline and follow-up clinical and anthropometric phenotypes.

Results: Baseline assessments revealed that ICU patients exhibited significantly higher disease severity and nutritional risk, characterized by elevated SGA, APACHE IV, SOFA, and NUTRIC scores, alongside lower GCS scores compared to the non-ICU cohort (p<0.05). Notably, 15.32% of ICU patients were classified as high risk via NUTRIC scores, compared to only 0.81% in the non-ICU group.

 

Assessment / Intervention

ICU

Non-ICU

NUTRIC Score (High Risk)

15.32%

0.81%

SGA (Critical/Immediate)

98.39%

89.52%

BMI (Underweight)

43.55%

50.81%

Primary Feeding Route

 

Oral Nutrition

4.84%

62.10%

Enteral Nutrition (RT)

94.35%

37.90%

Parenteral (TPN)

0.81%

0.00%

Common Diet Type

Balanced + Albumin (33.9%)

Liquid (45.2%)

Conclusion: Trauma patients in the ICU showed pronounced metabolic derangement and inflammatory profiles that require specialized nutritional intervention. While injury severity remains a dominant predictor of mortality, the implementation of a structured NCP is essential for recovery from physiological deficits and improving clinical management. 

Disclosure of Interest: None declared