LB108 - PREOPERATIVE PARASYMPATHETIC AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION AS A PREDICTOR OF POSTOPERATIVE GASTROINTESTINAL DYSFUNCTION AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY

Linked sessions

LB108

PREOPERATIVE PARASYMPATHETIC AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION AS A PREDICTOR OF POSTOPERATIVE GASTROINTESTINAL DYSFUNCTION AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY

A. Menon1,2,*, N. Tetlow2, A. Dewar2, R. Stephens3, D. Martin4,5, J. Whittle3,6

1Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Free Hospital, 2Human Physiology and Performance Laboratory (HPPL), University College London, 3Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, 4University of Plymouth, 5Department of Intensive Care, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, 6Human Physiology and Performance Laboratory (HPPL), University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom

 

Rationale: Parasympathetic autonomic dysfunction (PAD) is common in surgical patients & is a risk factor for postoperative morbidity. We hypothesised that PAD predisposes to postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD), which is a common & serious complication after radical cystectomy (RC). We aimed to show an association between PAD & POGD following RC using I-FEED, a novel tool to identify & grade POGD.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing RC at University College London Hospital between 2019 & 2022. PAD was defined as heart rate recovery ≤12 beats per minute, 1 minute after cessation of loaded exercise during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. POGD was assessed using the POMS-GI & I-FEED tools. The primary outcome was POGD on day 5 after RC. Secondary outcomes assessed cardiopulmonary fitness, preoperative inflammation & survival. Ethics approval was previously granted. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 11.0.1 (99).

Results: 169 patients were analysed, 70% of whom had PAD. Patients with PAD were more likely to experience POGD (p=0.0329). Patients with POGD had longer length of stay (LOS) in ICU & hospital (p=0.0025, p<0.0001). Patients with impaired ventilation/perfusion matching were more likely to develop POGD (p=0.0304).

Conclusion: We believe this is the first presented use of I-FEED to describe POGD after RC. I-FEED correlated well with POMS-GI, ICU LOS & hospital LOS, suggesting that it accurately captured postoperative morbidity. PAD was more than twice as common in this cohort compared to similar previous studies. Patients with PAD had higher I-FEED scores than those without, consistent with a direct relationship. I-FEED accurately tracked POMS-GI (AUC 0.8604). I-FEED ≥4 most accurately defined POGD (overall accuracy 82.84%, Youden’s J index 0.6232). 

Disclosure of Interest: None declared