PP286 - INFLAMMATORY CYTOKINE PROGNOSTIC SCORE AND NUTRITION–MUSCLE PHENOTYPES IN GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA

Linked sessions

PP286

INFLAMMATORY CYTOKINE PROGNOSTIC SCORE AND NUTRITION–MUSCLE PHENOTYPES IN GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA

C. He1, H. Zhou1, G. Wu1, Z. Li1, D. Huang1,*, X. Shen1, W. Sun1

1The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

 

Rationale: TNM staging describes tumour extent but does not account for the host inflammatory and nutritional status that may influence outcome after gastrectomy. We assessed whether a preoperative inflammatory cytokine prognostic score (ICPS) provides additional prognostic information and whether its combination with nutrition–muscle phenotypes improves risk stratification.

Methods: This prospective cohort enrolled 492 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (2021-2024). ICPS (0-6) was constructed from preoperative serum IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ and dichotomized as low (0-1) or high (2-6). Inverse probability of treatment weighting reduced baseline imbalance. Malnutrition, sarcopenia, and cachexia were defined per GLIM, AWGS 2019, and AWGC 2023 criteria. Overall survival was estimated with weighted Cox models. A nomogram was built using random survival forest-guided variable selection and validated internally by bootstrap resampling.

Results: After weighting, high ICPS was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.29-3.11; P=0.002). Correlations between ICPS and nutrition-muscle indices were weak (all |r|<0.10), suggesting these measures capture different aspects of host vulnerability. Co-occurrence of high ICPS and malnutrition yielded higher mortality risk (adjusted HR 5.29, 95% CI 2.95-9.48). Adding ICPS to the base clinicopathological model improved OS discrimination at 1, 2, and 3 years (IDI 0.021, 0.032, 0.040; all P≤0.030).

Conclusion: Preoperative ICPS was associated with overall survival after radical gastrectomy and provided prognostic information not captured by nutrition-muscle phenotypes alone. Joint assessment identified a subgroup with poorer outcome. These findings require multi-centre external validation and external validation is needed before broader clinical use.

Disclosure of Interest: None declared