PD772 - IMPACT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES ON NUTRITIONAL AND MORPHOFUNCTIONAL PROFILE IN MALNOURISHED GERIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS: ANYVIDA SUBANALYSIS

Linked sessions

PD772

IMPACT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES ON NUTRITIONAL AND MORPHOFUNCTIONAL PROFILE IN MALNOURISHED GERIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS: ANYVIDA SUBANALYSIS

H. Rendon Barragan1,*, M. T. Yeregui Balda1, B. F. Rodriguez Montalvan2, M. J. Chinchetru Ranedo2, S. Lanes Iglesias3, C. Fernandez Lopez4, B. De Leon Fuentes4, E. Diego Perojo4, R. Fernandez Jimenez5, I. Gonzalo Montesinos6, J. M. Garcia-Almeida5 on behalf of Anyvida Group

1Nutricion, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, 2Endocrinologia y Nutricion, Hospital Universitario San Pedro, 3Endocrinologia y Nutricion, Hospital Universitario San Pedro, Logroño, 4Endocrinologia y Nutricion, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Bilbao, 5Nutricion, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, 6Endocrinologia y Nutricion, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain

 

Rationale: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is common in older adults and may affect nutritional and muscle status in oncology. We compared geriatric cancer patients with and without T2DM in the ANYVIDA cohort.

Methods: Observational subanalysis of patients aged ≥65 years from the ANYVIDA study with GLIM-defined malnutrition. Groups were compared for clinical and oncological variables, comorbidities, nutritional status, confirmed sarcopenia, anthropometry, biochemistry, bioimpedance, nutritional ultrasound, strength and functional test.

Results: A total of 325 patients were included: 83 (25.5%) with T2DM and 242 (74.5%) without. T2DM patients were older (74.5±5.7 vs 72.7±5.9 years; p=0.016) and had higher usual (76.3±12.4 vs 72.2±14.2 kg; p=0.019) and current weight (67.1±12.2 vs 63.6±14.6 kg; p=0.049). They showed more comorbidities, especially hypertension, ischemic heart disease, dysphagia and stroke, whereas tumor type, stage and treatment were similar. Creatinine (0.94±0.45 vs 0.85±0.30 mg/dL; p=0.046) and transferrin (249.1±73.3 vs 224.0±66.4 mg/dL; p=0.031) were higher in the T2DM group. GLIM severity was similar, with moderate malnutrition predominating in both groups (81.5% vs 79.1%), as was confirmed sarcopenia prevalence (95.1% vs 97.5%). No significant differences were found in bioimpedance, most ultrasound variables or functional tests. Only abdominal ultrasound measurement distance was greater in T2DM (8.35±1.85 vs 7.91±1.69; p=0.049).

Conclusion: In malnourished geriatric cancer patients, T2DM was associated with older age, higher body weight, greater comorbidity burden and minor biochemical differences, but not with worse  nutritional or morphofunctional status.

References: Cong M, et al. Nutritional status and survival of 8247 cancer patients with or without diabetes mellitus: results from a prospective cohort study. Cancer Med. 2020;9(20):7428-7439.

Disclosure of Interest: None declared